Anything else?
What else do you want to tell us?
This discussion topic is closed. You can still review the discussion but it will no longer accept comments or votes.
Berto
5:50pm, 9 October 2009
10Bring back the Renegade in the Catani gardens! It's great to see alternative crews be part of the festival.. It's also a great party there sometimes.
Bring more events during the week! More "big" events, some friday night shows, or beach events during the evenings leading to Sudnay??
Some special ephemeral constructions like the Soco were great!
Some classical / jazz brunch / food events, longest breakfast on the beach or so?!
sleeperhq
12:04am, 17 October 2009
8We got to work with some fantastic bands & be part of a well run event. From a band's perspective it's a great festival experience, from the organisation & support, to the show itself.
andrew9
7:43pm, 20 October 2009
10yeah , just don't ruin it because of a few complaints . i 've enjoyed 19 festival's and am looking forward to many more in this exciting suburb . also keep it free !
Hedrick76
2:53pm, 25 October 2009
5Hey I only heard about this on facebook, you should make sure you tell everyone about it so everyone can say what they think, expecially if the festival might get cancelled
ali_harry
7:37pm, 29 October 2009
3yeh me too i saw a message on fb about this. i thought there'd be like big ads or posters up coz not everyone has fb and i reckon there would be people who will hear about this after its closed and be a bit annoyed if they missed out! i know i would be
St Kilda Local Guy
5:04pm, 27 October 2009
10More events as part of the live N local would be fantastic. Maybe some events on Friday and saturday nights, finishing at 9pm would be good, like a Jazz concert on the foreshore or a symphony or some fireworks, or all of the above.
Keep up the good work council.
St Kilda Cutie
6:44pm, 27 October 2009
6Jemima_A_83
7:16pm, 27 October 2009
5I'm surprise more people haven't been commenting on this. I just hope St Kilda Fest stays around for a long time to come. I loved it when I was a teenager, now coming into my late twenties and I know I will still love it when I'm a grumpy old fart at 100. Keep up the good work! This is why I live in Port Phillip, because the council actually does good stuff like this.
andrew9
7:34am, 28 October 2009
5David@StKildaRoad
11:01am, 29 October 2009
4I think the Council need to understand that the event is paid for by residents and ask the question as to whether this event is really for the residents. Who does this festival serve?
As I have stated elsewhere on this site, I would support smaller localised art festival for the residents to come together.
How many of the responses here on this website are residents of the CoPP?
ali_harry
7:41pm, 29 October 2009
6if you read through the comments on the forum it seems like quite a few of these people live in the area.
i think council understand the festival is paid for by ratepayers, and thats probably why its under review. but there would be a whole bunch of ratepayers that would love and support the festival as well. you cant make everyone happy. also that argument doesnt really stand up because everyone ends up paying for things they dont use or even like. i think st kilda festival is as much for the residents as it is for everyone else. its pretty selfish if you just want an event for residents. do you ever go to events funded by other councils?
DRay
1:25am, 30 October 2009
6I agree David.
The festival day is past its use by date. I suspect that it was meant to be a draw card but it's no longer needed. St Kilda draws enough visitors on weekends now. The festival day is just excessive.
I laugh when I read that it's the 3rd biggest street festival in the world - such a testerone-induced comment. It's big, it must be good huh?!
I like to consider that we are a smart society and can see past the need for the festival day.
All my friends love st kilda and like to visit here but none see the festival day as a drawcard; the drawcards are acland street, the espy, the espy market, linden, galleon, dogs bar, carlisle street, the prince.
If anything the council needs strategies to get visitors durinf off-peak times (weekdays and winter) when the likes of fitzroy street are desolate
Another_Old_StKilda_Resident
9:04am, 31 October 2009
3I love St Kilda, and have done so for the last 50 years. I love it's restaurants, the music and the street life. I also love the atmosphere the festival creates and always invite my friends in to share it. If you don't, that's a pity, but I don't see what that has to do with being a 'smart society'.
daffodil
11:47am, 12 November 2009
1I also support a smaller and localized festival - could be a great way for bringing locals together and to encourage greater engagement with the local community
Adrian Jackson of Middle Park
2:28pm, 14 November 2009
0It is paid for largely by RATEPAYERS and not necessarily RESIDENTS unless the residents are ratepayer too. Residents can simply be renters to pay no rates directly to the Port Phillip City Council (PPCC)
Jemima_A_83
7:11pm, 15 November 2009
0We pay rent Adrian, which I'm sure includes a passed on fee for rates? I hardly think a property owner is not going to try to recoup that from their tenants. That would be a fairly silly business decision if they didnt't pass that cost on. We have equal rights and and equal say. You are not some divine power from above on all things council because you pay rates directly.
Jemima_A_83
12:07pm, 29 October 2009
5As a resident, I am really tired of hearing a small group of other residents whinge and moan about what St Kilda has always been and what it always should be. If they don't like it, why on earth did they move to the area? Constructive criticism about the festival and St Kilda is totally warranted - nothing is ever going to be perfect in this world we live in, but what I'm seeing on this forum is pure whinging. This is clearly a much larger issue of these voices being loud and irrational and god help us all if Council does actually take heed of them. To all of those people, if you don't want what you call 'disruption' there is plenty of coast line along the bay, perhaps it's time to move??
DRay
1:08am, 30 October 2009
4I didn't move to the area. I was born here - as was three generations of my family (on the maternal side).
The festival was good but it's dated now. The smaller events are great but we can manage without the Sunday festival day.
ANY Sunday the traffic can be extreme; I used to go bush every second sunday to get away from the tourist scourge. So festival day is no big deal in that respect.
Honestly the only cultural mix on festival day is the bogans (from the 'burbs) with the ferals (from north of the yarra)
andrew9
8:54am, 30 October 2009
2Jemima_A_83
11:11am, 30 October 2009
3What a pompous and snubby attitude! So having lived in St Kilda your entire life entitles you to ownership of the streets, does it? St Kilda and the festival is for EVERYONE to share regardless of background.
If hundreds of thousands of people enjoy the festival every year, surely it's not dated. Perhaps you have just grown out of it which is totally understandable, but at least recognise that instead of attempting to ruin the opportunity for those in their prime to experience it.
Another_Old_StKilda_Resident
9:07am, 31 October 2009
4Yeah? I can clam 3 generations as well. Bogans and ferals? You've got to be kidding? Do you have a problem mixing with young people having fun?
LaLola
3:35pm, 31 October 2009
6This online forum is about the Festival, not about who should live in St Kilda and who should go. I hope Council listens to all voices, including the 'small groups', and addresses their concerns. A tolerant and diverse society (which many claim St Kilda to be) respects its minorities and welcomes different points of view. It's a bit rich telling people they should move out of St Kilda because they disagree with your view of the Festival.
Jemima_A_83
11:09pm, 5 November 2009
2I don't think they should move out because they disagree with my view of the festival. Although I do think their view is unrealistic and out of touch. The people that I am criticising are the ones who are complaining about St Kilda in general hence if they don't like it, clearly it doesn't suit their lifestyle. No one is bound to a particular suburb and neither should they be. However, if they choose to stay and attempt to ruin the fun for everyone else by harassing Council at any given moment - as from what I have read in variou forums seems to be the case of St Kilda Festival (hence why this is relevant) then they should definitely move. One of the comments above speaks for itself, LaLola.
Davidson
3:05pm, 14 November 2009
0Who are you going to get to pay for your festival if all the rate payers move to other suburbs?
Jemima_A_83
5:58pm, 15 November 2009
0The people who remain in or move to St Kilda because they adore St Kilda for what it offers instead of living inside a bubble like you guys, constantly complaining about everything. I believe someone once said you should always look on the bright side of life, Davidson.
Adrian Jackson of Middle Park
2:55pm, 29 October 2009
3No temporary booze outlets in the middle of the road (eg)Upper Esplanade. No packaged booze sales (slabs etc) on the festival day. All drinking at licenced pub and cafes etc. Last year there was a problem in Fitzroy St with a bottle shops selling the stuff to the crowd who then had is topped out by the police 100m away.
The 96 tram should still got to Acland St with the pedestrians keeping to the footpaths and road usually used by cars. All the new platform tram stops (only) should be used for festival attendees. Perhaps a tram doing a loop for the day would be good (Fitzroy St, Upper Esplanade, Carlisle St, Brighton Rd and back to Fitzroy St). Why not use the historic old trams with the open sides for this. The new crossing at the west end of Fitzroy St to Catani Gardens need more work once you cross. The Catani Garden side is still a mess, the steps are to small (not wide enough) and dangerous, the areas around the WW1 memorial is a pedestrian choke point and dangerous.
DRay
1:01am, 30 October 2009
5Make the whole festival booze free. Drinking in venues but not in public areas; people who can't manage to enjoy without drink to be locked up in a tank for 4 - 5 hours.
Jemima_A_83
7:15pm, 15 November 2009
0And how would local venues cope with the excessive additional demand if there were no temporary bars? I'm sure those businesses would absolutely love being in the firing line of liquor licensing with no support from the event organisers. Awesome.
ranchsam
4:33pm, 29 October 2009
6I think the St Kilda Festival is great, I really don't understand what some people get so stressed about. The big Festival day only happens once a year and to me it seems really well managed. I always have a great time with my friends and have been going for years. I hope for the sake of the next generation of music lovers that it sticks around for another 30 years as it's a bit of a right of passage for Melbournians and alike! There aren’t many free events in Melbourne these days and to be able to come together as one community and celebrate Australia music in a great place like St Kilda….well, it's priceless really
ChanStk
7:36pm, 29 October 2009
4I am CONVINCED St Kilda Festival is here to stay!!!! The pro's out weigh the con's by far!
Adrian Jackson of Middle Park
5:12pm, 30 October 2009
1The quick survey on the right needs to show the numbers who have voted as well as the percentage "pie" give that as at today only a few dozen have commented in the general section (this area) which surprises me after nearly a month online
Project Coordinator
Review Coordination
5:19pm, 2 November 2009
1The results of the quick poll will be available on the site once the consultation closes.
LaLola
4:23pm, 31 October 2009
4Increase the number of stages on Festival Sunday and get rid of non arts or music related events. In their place showcase other performing arts such as theatre, dance, choirs, ensembles, circus and street performers. Nothing much happens on the Esplanade. This area could be filled with colour, movement, dancing, art displays, community stalls, roving performers, installations. Instead of fat tyre fliers, and V8 supercar simulators, the triangle area could be filled with cabaret, circus, vaudeville, merry-go-rounds, theatre sports, clowns, workshops.
Get rid of the licensed bars in O’Donnell Gardens and on the Esplanade. If people need a drink, there’s plenty of bars in Fitzroy and Acland Streets. Keep the public areas – streets, foreshore and parks – alcohol (and drug) free.
Improve safety and amenity for residents. Get serious about managing unruly behaviour. Use Festival information and promotion to set clear behaviour guidelines for public and private space (eg parties, drinking in the streets, urinating, blocking access) and increase police/security presence, including mounted police and sniffer dogs. Clamp down on unruly behaviour, drunkenness, and drugs. Fine offenders on the spot and/or throw them out of the Festival area.
Betty
10:49am, 4 November 2009
3I think the festival is a well run entity. I love that there is a large-scale well organized event on my doorstep. I do believe however, that more local artists (musicians, performers, visual artists) need to be involved. And I think the festival must work to once again win the hearts and minds of some locals.
I believe that this can be done by including a well structured and diverse free community arts program as an integral component to the festival structure. This program could employ local professional arts practicioners to run workshops and programs for the community as a lead up to the event. This could culminate in community performances / presentations during the festival.
Strong D
5:09pm, 5 November 2009
6St Kilda Festival doesnt have to be for everyone. It will never be all things to all people. It shouldnt even try to be. But 400,000 people like it. That makes it pretty popular! In fact, it makes it the most popular single day event in the country. Larger attendance than the Cup, larger attendance than the GF, larger... attendance than NYE in the CBD. People vote with their feet. If you dont like it, dont go, its probably not for you. But that doesnt mean everyone else shouldnt enjoy it. Its the biggest outdoor free music event in the country. Its extremely poular with people 16 - 35 years. It has its place, it's loved, it works. Like all good festivals it has been evolving and changing for 30 years just like St Kilda itself. I hope it evolves and changes for at least another 30 more!
Strong D
5:57pm, 5 November 2009
4Remember music is an art form and younger people love it. There aren't many opportunities to hear big Australian music artists for free but St Kilda Festival provides that.
Just good to remind ourselves how the demographics of St kilda are made up and why St Kilda Festival is so popular.
The Festival caters to the majority. St Kilda is full of a disproportionate number of unmarried younger people. Just check out the stats below. The free live music St Kilda Festival programs works so well because younger unmarried people like it!
Age Statistics 3182 Melbourne
20 to 39 52% 33%
40 to 59 24% 28%
60+ 13% 17%
5 to 19 7% 14%
0 to 4 3% 7%
Family Statistics - Top 5 3182 Melbourne
Never Married 59% 33%
Married 24% 51%
Divorced 9% 7%
Widowed 4% 6%
Separated 3% 3%
Taken from Domain.com.au Suburb Profile
Adrian Jackson of Middle Park
10:10pm, 5 November 2009
0There are not 300,000 people in St Kilda. Most attendees NOW are middle and upper middle class kids and young adults from the eastern "burbs". I have noticed this change over the last 5 years. Gone are the days of the grung types who used to attend from Brunswick, Carlton and the other left suburbs of the northern and western suburbs.
andrew9
6:29am, 7 November 2009
1Adrian Jackson of Middle Park
10:20am, 7 November 2009
0The way they dress, behave and the fact they appear drug free unlike many of the St Kilda push. The lower classes dress differently and poorly but most of the current attended appear to have money and dress well
Davidson
3:18pm, 14 November 2009
1I think you're drawing a long bow by saying the demographic 20 to 39 are all lovers of the live mainstream music that we see on Festival Day.
However, based on your stats there's an argument that our rates would be better spent if on a "Speed Dating" festival instead.
Jemima_A_83
6:07pm, 15 November 2009
1If you look a little closer, Davidson, I think you will find that the majority of music presented on festival day is not actually mainstream at all. Open your windows and actually listen to what it has on offer. You'd probably get a very pleasant surprise.
Tony
10:16pm, 5 November 2009
4I'm a bit concerned about the amount of people here claiming some kind of ownership over St Kilda as a holy resident. What are we really saying here except that these people have the right to vote a council in or out, which is not the point?
I'm not a resident of St Kilda, but maybe I have been before, and maybe I will be again, or maybe I'd like to start a business there. So maybe it belongs to everyone and everyone's opinion counts? And of course the festival is held in public spaces which means, you guessed it, they belong to the public! Not only residents, although maybe you could try some locked gates so bogans can keep out in future.
In actual fact I would like to point out that in fact I also help pay for the festival, through arts victoria which funds it and is the state government. I dare say I also fund it through my foxtel subscription. And I even fund it through the parking tickets I buy at least once a week to park in "your" fine suburb.
And before someone replies that residents are more important because they are so horribly upset by the noise and the behvaiour of other people, please try and put this one day aside for the sake of what the festival means to people before you ruin not only the festival but st kilda itself. St kilda is great not because of the people who live there (hard to believe I know) but because of the gatherings that happen there, the history, the places to go see music, the beach...shall I go on? And we all have a responsibility to ourselves and our kids to keep it great.
Davidson
3:22pm, 14 November 2009
0"And we all have a responsibility to ourselves and our kids to keep it great."
That's easy to say when you don't have to host the Festival.
We, St Kilda locals are the ones who have to foot the bill, and put up with the noise and inconvenience that comes from holding it.
Maybe we should have it in your suburb next year :)
stkildastateofmind
3:34pm, 7 November 2009
3Love love love the festival! CoPP festival team do an AMAZING job managing it, so congratulations!! It must feel fantastic to know that you contribute so much to all the people that attend each year. The reason people come every year is because they love it, they love the music, the atmosphere, the celebration! So please don't feel unappreciated because as you well know, resident groups have been trying to straighten up st kilda for a very long time. Like all the poor old things that bought cheap houses in Greeves St and then expected the prostitutes to go away. Don't forget the people that buy houses near loud bars and live music venues and then complain about the noise. Angry residents are also a part of st kilda, it takes all kinds to keep interesting! I have met some of these people over the years and I've listened to the complaints, but I see most of their faces at the festival each year! They enjoy it too otherwise they would go somewhere else that day.... So just think, if you bring joy to angry residents even for an hour or two, how great is that?!
Your team improve and adapt the festival every year and I'm sure you always will!
Adrian Jackson of Middle Park
10:05am, 8 November 2009
2The St Kilda Festival is held at the wrong time of the year. St Kilda is full of visitors already in Summer and with climate change the weather is getting hotter in Summer. After the festival much of the foreshore vegetation is trampled under foot too. Have it in Spring or Autumn instead.
Adrian Jackson of Middle Park
7:36pm, 9 November 2009
0While this survey has been extended to 16 Nov 09 there are still two referenced to the closing date being 09 Nov 09 on the Survey site and the PPCC homepage link. Need fixing - attention to detail.
daffodil
11:43am, 12 November 2009
2The festival in its current format may once have been useful for “putting St Kilda on the map” in terms of local venues and restaurants, but this is no longer necessary. For many traders it is “the worst day of the year”.
The live music scene has already — DESPITE the focus of the festival over the past decade or more — essentially migrated from St Kilda to other parts of Melbourne.
Benefits of the festival: I don’t see the current format as offering anything in the way of benefits. The Live N Local events are 'nice enough', but for me do not offset the horror of the scale of the invasion & the alcohol-fuelled nature of Festival Sunday. If the festival was primarily a Live N Local type of event, or a Festival Sunday GENUINELY tried to cater to all generations then PERHAPS it would have the virtue of uniting disparate elements of our community. (By genuinely I mean catered equally to all generations, not mainly rock or dance music with an odd classical or jazz performance.) Generally I think everything the festival offers can be easily obtained elsewhere (live music, bars, restaurants, crowds) or on another occasion (the beach, St Kilda parklands). I don’t think Melbourne’s 18-30 year olds need any more encouragement to ‘party’, let alone Council-sponsored encouragement.
I hope Council doesn’t give too much weight to the views of the 18-30 demographic when determining the future of the festival. This is the one demographic which already faces an extensive choice in terms of activities and venues in St Kilda and the nearby areas of Chapel Street and the city. Commercial interests already overwhelmingly target and cater to this demographic. It seems to me Council could offer a far more valuable service to its community if it found ways to unite the “diverse” elements of our community rather than to further emphasize its generational differences, and in my view anything which is targeted primarily at the 18-30 demographic is actually fostering and enabling alienation of disparate elements of our community. I imagine 18-30 year olds feel differently.
Impacts: Trade for many businesses is greatly reduced; many residents leave town; there are costs & inconvenience associated with litter and broken glass; anti-social behaviour (largely alcohol/drug-related) in terms of urination, noise, vandalism, litter, some violence, cars blocking egress and difficulties getting in or out of the neighbourhood. In other words, significantly reduced amenity for residents ranging from inconvenience to discomfort and in some cases a negative impact on health & well-being.
Note — it is worth considering the difference in atmosphere and crowd behaviours associated with the 2006 Commonwealth Games events in St Kilda/Melbourne and the usual atmosphere & behaviours on Festival Sunday. It’s not large numbers of people per se, but the nature of the event and kinds of behaviours this constructs and condones.
I see the alcohol-related/partying behaviours of the 18-30 year demographic, and the consequences of these behaviours, as being THE single greatest problem in the “interface between residential and visitor impact” and thus believe any Council-supported festival needs to be:
· relevant and appealing to all generations
· one in which the relationship between the festival and alcohol is non-existent or extremely indirect (ie, little to do with rock or dance music)
In other words, I believe the Council cannot in good conscience support the current format of the festival.
If we do have to put up with an alcohol/drug-soaked event then, yes, I want to see everything possible done to encourage behavioural changes.
The claim that Festival Sunday is important because it nurtures local musicians is in my view exaggerated as we know there are many other venues and avenues for emerging bands or musicians, particularly with today’s technology and the connectedness of the online world, and a significant number of other festivals in Australia.
Indirect costs: Many residents pay to leave their homes for the weekend. Some may need to pay for repair to damage.
Re: sustainability - my view of sustainability, in no particular order or priority, is that it is founded on health & well-being, respect for others, diversity, care for the environment and conservation of resources and that it works to further nurture these principles in the form of outcomes. I don’t see that Festival Sunday is founded on these principles or that it achieves any of these outcomes. I don’t see anything all that sustainable about a festival in which people of (predominantly) one age demographic are implicitly encouraged to drink alcohol — and rock or dance music & alcohol/drugs DO go together — at licensed venues if not council-sponsored bars, or eat junk food from concession stands/vans, and where many of the attendants (& indeed in some ways festival organizers) behave with little regard or respect for the local environment, local people or people from other demographics.
ali_harry
12:24pm, 13 November 2009
1Wow. I don’t really know where to start with this…
Benefits of the festival: “I don’t see the current format as offering anything in the way of benefits”. This is fairly evident of the tunnel vision many nay-sayers of the St Kilda Festival tend to have. I love the festival, yet I can see how it must impact on the residents and understand that there are probably some areas for improvement – so why can’t people who oppose the festival admit that there are many great things about it?! The festival DOES promote local musicians and provide exposure for bands. Sure, there are lots of avenues out there for live performance, but there’s not many that will expose bands to as many people as are present on festival day. And yes, there are a lot of other festivals in Australia, but most of them promote international bands, or already successful Australian bands. There’s not really any other festival that gives such high profile to emerging Australian bands and so the St Kilda Festival is important for this reason.
The festival is a popular event, there’s no doubt about that. Moreso, it is popular with many age groups. At this year’s festival I was walking around and I saw lots of families, and old people as well as young people. I guess there would be more people in the 18-30 age bracket, but if you look at those statistics above that’s representative of the area.
Now, it’s pretty obvious that you’re not in this “18-30 demographic”, and I guess by now it’s obvious that I am! I’m quite insulted by your comment “I hope Council doesn’t give too much weight to the views of the 18-30 demographic when determining the future of the festival.” How often does council really engage the 18-30 year olds? I know they don’t engage me very much. I think St Kilda Festival and the film festival are the only two things that I really admire council for doing, and what I think differentiates them from other councils. Yes, there are lots of activities for my age group – but there are activities for every age group, you just have to get out there and look for them.
I think if council changes the festival to suit the minority of people who seem to have a problem with it, or go so far as to cancel it or scale it back to some small event, they will lose the support of a lot of young people, who are the future of this area. If you don’t engage young people now then they’re not going to be interested later. I can’t speak for everyone, but I know my friends and I would be outraged if the St Kilda Festival was changed beyond recognition just because a few residents have an issue on one day of the year.
Jemima_A_83
4:34pm, 13 November 2009
1Wow indeed. What a scary world we live in to think people like 'daffodil' actually think like this.
Couldn't have said it better myself, Ali. We will vote with our feet come February and we will vote at council elections if the spirit of this event is murdered by this unfortunate small minorty of narrow minded pessimists who seem to live within their own individual bubbles.
Davidson
3:56pm, 14 November 2009
0Jemima_A_83
6:11pm, 15 November 2009
1Threat? I doubt it. We live in a democratic nation. I will show my support for the festival by attending and vote against council if I disagree with the decisions they make. Hardly a threat. Don't exaggerate. Simply my right to have a voice and if others are like minded, it will get us a very long way.
LaLola
2:38pm, 14 November 2009
1Removed by moderator - potential breach of confidentiality.
Jemima_A_83
6:16pm, 15 November 2009
1We haven't been abusive at all LaLola and I don't see and shouting. Like Davidson, don't exaggerate. We simply speak against residents who find it ok to slander our generation or where people are from. You might recall someone early referencing 'ferals' and 'bogans' earlier. If that means we have questioned why residents live in St Kilda if there is so much they dislike about it then that is purely a question or suggestion to make these people think about it. Hardly abuse.
Davidson
3:39pm, 14 November 2009
1I think you misunderstood the what 'daffodil' was saying about the 18-30 demographic. He/she wrote
"This is the one demographic which already faces an extensive choice in terms of activities and venues in St Kilda and the nearby areas of Chapel Street and the city. Commercial interests already overwhelmingly target and cater to this demographic."
The demographic already have a lot of choices in St Kilda. We don't need to go out of our way to make more for them. Better we put our money towards the excluded and forgotten communities.
As such, I would like to see council money spent towards other demographics which are not catered for already by commercial interests - such as the disabled, the aged, the working poor, the marginalized. Money should be spent on providing more parks, more social housing, more community houses etc, etc.
"I guess there would be more people in the 18-30 age bracket, but if you look at those statistics above that’s representative of the area."
The statistics about talk about the 20-39 demographic, not the 18-30 demographic. You can't make generalizations about St Kilda from them as you do.
"I think if council changes the festival to suit the minority of people who seem to have a problem with it, or go so far as to cancel it or scale it back to some small event, they will lose the support of a lot of young people, who are the future of this area..."
Note: Threats don't make your ideas more powerful.
Jemima_A_83
6:20pm, 15 November 2009
1These 'threats' as you so call them, do make our ideas powerful if many of us agree. Again, Davidson, we live in a democracy, in case you had forgotten, and we will vote against the current council at the next election if we disagree with their decisions made about St Kilda Festival.
ali_harry
5:45pm, 16 November 2009
1Nope, didn't misunderstand. I just think that my age group have just as much right to a council funded event as anyone else, and using the excuse that there's lots for us to do isn't really relevant. Like I said, there's lots for anyone to do.
LaLola
6:48pm, 14 November 2009
0Ali, The emerging musicians are mainly promoted during the week in the Live 'n Local component. The only exposure for emerging musicians on the big Sunday is the New Music Stage, a small stage tucked into Belford Street, off Acland. This link explains the programming of the stages on Festival Sunday http://stkildafestival.com.au/contentPage.php?id=4
The quote below is from the Q&A for emerging musicians:
"How do we get to play on the other stages?
All other St Kilda Festival stages are programmed by a contracted music programmer. Bands cannot apply to be on any other stage."
Jemima_A_83
6:25pm, 15 November 2009
1Whilst they are more established than the performers on the new music stage, a large number of the acts on the others stages like the one next to luna park and the one up on the grassy bit near the novotel are not that well known or don't have a massive amount of exposure usually themselves. They might also be of a niche genre so the festival gives them access to new and broad audiences. The main stage with established artists clearly needs to be there to pull a crowd in the first place. Think about it.
Jemima_A_83
6:57pm, 15 November 2009
1There is also a stage on the main festival day presented by The Push which showcases really young people (I'm talking high school age) that are local to Port Phillip and a few of the surrounding municipalities. The Push is an initiative alongside FREEZA that is State Government driven to help talented young artists get a leg up in competition format. The bands on the main festival day are competing to get a slot at the PushOver Festival to play alongside big name acts. You can imagine for a young person how special this kind of opportunity would be. They also project anti-drug and alcohol messages and have other volunteer young people on the non-performing side helping the running of the event. You should check it out: http://www.thepush.asn.au/
ali_harry
5:38pm, 16 November 2009
1Well, yes there are lots of emerging musicians during Live n local, but if I think back to the last festival and the bands that i saw on the day, there would only be a few that I would classify as actually big name bands. Most of the bands, even some on the big stage, are still making their name in the music industry. Just because they're programmed by a music programmer doesn't mean they're not emerging.
Hedrick76
10:12am, 14 November 2009
0Removed by moderator. This comment failed to respect other forum members and their views.
LaLola
2:49pm, 14 November 2009
0Wow, your rant, and Jemima's above, are excellent examples of tolerance and inclusiveness!
Jemima_A_83
6:48pm, 15 November 2009
2Rant??? I don't think so LaLola! Here's a question: How would you react is someone wrote about your generation 'I hope Council doesn’t give too much weight to the views of the <insert age bracket here> demographic when determining the future of the festival.' I am pretty certain you would be outraged like Hendrick76 is or at least form a fairly grim judgement of that person's way of thinking also. The reason the 18-30 age bracket or 'Gen Y' has a lot of choices in life overall is because we are the ones with spending power, just as you were at that age. We pump a hell of a lot of money into our robust economy and from the government at all levels we don't see much return from that at all. Let us have fun for a day in St Kilda to the music we love. You were young once also and it would be wonderful if you could jog your memory back for a moment to see where we're coming from. I see your problems with amenity and sure someone weeing in your front yard or pulling a picket off your fence or whatever would be really freaking annoying, I agree that that stuff should be addressed and I'm pretty sure the professional event organisers that produce the event probably work hard to try to do that already. Don't let your issues ruin the event for majority of us who act responsibly, have harmless fun and love the event in it's current format, including the different activities and amazing music that are there for us to enjoy. There are festivals like St Kilda Festival throughout the rest of the world, why can't we have one too? What is with this overall attitude (and I don't mean from you personally necessarily) at the moment that enjoying life somehow has to be done in a conservative, straight laced, I go to church on Sundays kind of way. Enjoying life can be that too, but it's not for everyone.
Davidson
3:46pm, 14 November 2009
0"I really hope that when I grow up I will learn to be small minded, short sighted, ignorant and divisive like my peers on this forum...".
Hope no longer. Your comment was small minded, short sighted, ignorant and divisive.
You are the person you claim to despise.
daffodil
1:46pm, 14 November 2009
2• To me the tone and dynamics of this forum replicate/echo Festival Sunday itself with the crowd of festival-goers colonizing and dominating St Kilda’s public space. Some of the excitement generated is respectful and inclusive, but it is underscored by a significant sense of belligerent entitlement and exclusion — “the festival is ours, St Kilda is ours, and if you don’t like it you should move”.
I find this sense of belligerent entitlement to be very hostile. I have lived in this area for 20 years. How have we got to the point where I can be told that because I do not conform to a particular demographic, or support a particular and deeply problematic event, I do not belong in the streets of my neighbourhood, my community, my home?
daffodil
1:47pm, 14 November 2009
1Recently I attended a meeting in which there was serious discussion with festival organizers as to the possible installation of temporary fencing on Festival Sunday to prevent festival-goers from urinating on residential property. At that point I felt like tearing my hair out in frustration at the absurdity of it all. Why are we even considering the continuation of this festival when this is the level to which things have descended? Why the persistence with ever-increasing efforts and forms of damage limitation in the face of such behaviours? So that people can have “fun”????? Is there no other source of fun in Melbourne these days???? Why does Council regard residential amenity to be so low on its list of priorities that the provision of “fun” continues in the face of such disrespectful and appalling behaviour? How have we got to the point where people think it is appropriate or acceptable for them to urinate on the gardens or walls of residents, or to drink or take drugs in the streets of a residential suburb?
Jemima_A_83
7:20pm, 15 November 2009
0Removed by moderator - the comment failed to respect the views of other users
ali_harry
9:40am, 16 November 2009
2"Why does Council regard residential amenity to be so low on its list of priorities"
I think the very fact that the St Kilda Festival is under review is a pretty good indication that council is treating residents' concerns very seriously. I'd say that that's the whole reason the review is taking place.
Also, people drink and take drugs in the streets regardless of St Kilda Festival. That's a problem with society, not a festival specific issue.
daffodil
1:48pm, 14 November 2009
2If Council seriously and genuinely wishes to review the current format of the St Kilda Festival it will be necessary for those engaged in the review process to spend face-to-face time with concerned residents to hear their concerns. This forum is not an adequate vehicle for the expression of such concerns, and its design and nature are suited primarily to a young age demographic. I find the nature of the forum to be belittling in the way it shapes and constrains responses, and in relation to the hostility expressed by some participants. It is an unpleasant vehicle which I am unhappily utilizing in the possibly vain attempt to have my views heard. If those conducting the review consider face-to-face meetings with other “stakeholders” to be necessary yet fail to offer the same consideration to residents it will seem their agenda is loaded and the review is not genuine.
Some questions I hope the review process considers:
1. If the festival is, in part, designed for the promotion of St Kilda, at what point will St Kilda be regarded as being sufficiently ‘on the map’? My guess would be that most international visitors to Melbourne already come to St Kilda, and that almost every Melburnian already knows what St Kilda has to offer.
Similarly, the population of Melbourne is growing rapidly but the bounds of St Kilda, a long-established and densely-populated suburb, are contained. How is the suburb of St Kilda expected to cope with an increasing number of visitors in the coming years, particularly during the warmer months of the year? How, in particular, will residents be expected to cope, and what impact/s will result in relation to the increasing number of visitors?
Has the time come for such ‘promotion’ of St Kilda to be abandoned as unnecessary? (It is worth noting here that for many, if not the majority, of traders it is a lost day or unwanted event.) Should St Kilda’s public prominence and visibility actually be reduced so as to enable a redirecting of visitor traffic to other CoPP or Melbourne localities?
2. Generational and societal changes in recent times are having a significant affect on the nature of visits to St Kilda. Commercial interests are also driving change. Visitors demonstrate, on the whole, less respect for residential property and amenity and a greater sense of entitlement to party and trash without regard for others or the environment. Is it even possible for an event which caters to hundreds of thousands of visitors and which incorporates alcohol &/or drug consumption as an integral part of the day to do anything but exacerbate this problem? (Yes, I understand that drug &/or alcohol consumption are not compulsory aspects of attendance but they DO take place, and very often to excess.)
Given that in many ways Festival Sunday sets the tone for visitor behaviour for the rest of the year, how are Council and festival organizers going to ‘raise the bar’ so that visitors understand they are welcome to share the pleasures of our suburb provided they do not litter, urinate, create public disturbances, vomit, jump on cars, drop glass bottles, block driveways etc? What are Council and festival organizers doing to ensure “Festival Sunday behaviours” and “partying” does not continue every warm evening on the beach?
Do these generational and societal changes render the current format of the festival inappropriate? Should Council re-conceive the event so that it has an inter-generational appeal, which offers the ancillary benefit of constructing a different set of behavioural expectations?
3. There is national recognition of problems associated with our culture’s binge-drinking phenomenon, particularly as it pertains to our youth. There is not, as yet, similar national recognition of problems associated with illegal drug usage, probably because illegal drug usage and its impacts are not as easily quantifiable. How does Council justify the promotion and sponsorship of a festival which implicitly encourages the drinking of alcohol or taking of illicit drugs, particularly among the demographic in which these behaviours are most problematic? (Yes, these behaviours are not a compulsory aspect of attendance but they are common, and part of the festival’s appeal.)
4. Given that sustainability is going to become an ever-increasing issue in the years ahead, should the festival be reconceived as a Sustainability Festival incorporating such things as slow food, local artists and musicians, ‘nana technology’ such as crafts, along with a range of activities relating to commodities such as bicycles, compost bins, etc etc. There could be, for instance, classes in the basics of bike maintenance, or composting, or the making of preserves, or organic vegetable growing. It could be a festival ‘by the locals, for the locals’ of the City of Port Phillip. Such a festival would offer local businesses and enterprises the opportunity to increase their profile within the City of Port Phillip, and offer residents the chance to engage in the community in new ways. It would also offer an opportunity for the various neighbourhoods of the City of Port Phillip to meet and engage in new ways, perhaps forging intra-city connections. This might indeed be a way in which Council could ‘strengthen our diverse and inclusive community’ as the event would have inter-generational appeal and any business or personal connections formed would be local.
5. Noise pollution is not simply an annoyance. It is an issue of health and well-being. Street festivals are not required to conform to SEPP N-2 legislation. St Kilda Festival organizers use SEPP N-2 as a guideline as it relates to decibel levels, but do not use it as a guideline for duration of exposure. Why does Council think it reasonable to subject residents to noise levels outside the SEPP N-2 guidelines? Why should residents who find the noise intolerable in form, volume and/or duration be forced out of their homes for the weekend? What about those who find the noise intolerable but are not able to escape their homes? Why is Council sponsoring this kind of noise pollution? Why are volume levels on Festival Sunday so much louder than other musical events in public spaces, such as Yalukit Willam Ngargee? Would the inclusion of more performance stages with lower volume levels be a way in which to address this problem?
Davidson
3:54pm, 14 November 2009
0Very good points.
At what point do we stop. Melbourne is growing, St Kilda is not. How much bigger will the influx of people to St Kilda Festival get?
And the idea that it sets the tone for people to come to St Kilda, binge drink and trash the place is true. You only need to remember the blanket of cans and stubbies that coated the beach after New Year's Eve these last few years.
daffodil
2:40pm, 14 November 2009
1It is the predominance of a particular demographic which is undesirable, as I see things.
I don't wish to see a festival attracting 200,000 to 300,000 55-70 year olds either. Or 200,000 to 300,000 5-10 year olds. Or 200,300 to 300,000 40-50 year olds.
Davidson
4:23pm, 14 November 2009
1Thinking about this, there's a rather big flaw in using this forum to gather feedback.
The younger demographic is far more fluent in using the web than the older demographics. As such, it's conceivable, that you will get more feedback from the younger demographic - who are likely to be in favour of the festival - than the older residents - who are likely to have trouble with the festival.
Also the format, which forces people to provide their feedback through only a very limited range of questions, prevents more complex and considered feedback from being given. This is because complex and considered feedback tends to be long and nuanced - and poor suited to be entered in a text box.
What is being done to address this imbalance?
Another_Old_StKilda_Resident
9:23am, 15 November 2009
3As an older (late 50s) long-term resident I would like to object a couple of things in this post. The generalisation that older residents are likely to have trouble with the festival may or may not be true - it's obvious that some residents have problems, but from what I've seen they overstate their case. I for one wholeheartedly support the festival and I know that most of my friends and relations who live in the area do as well.
I would also like to object to the suggestion that this forum is somehow more flawed than other methods of collecting opinions. The fact is that all the methods open to Council will be flawed in one way or another. For example, I know the Council had public meetings to discuss issues of interest earlier in the year but these were limited and I was unable to get to any because of work - and I imagine those meetings attracted a different demographic to the one here. Council will do best to have a range a ways of gathering information. If you want to discount the opinions here, you should also discount those other 'flawed' methods.
Davidson
5:57pm, 15 November 2009
0I agree with your point that all collection methods are flawed. That's why when seeking feedback people generally use several different methods. As you say, council would do best to have a range of ways of gathering information - to overcome bias.
I simply want to know that there are several methods being used. Because without this balancing, the feedback the council receives will be slanted towards youth, rather than presenting a true, well fleshed out picture.
Going on from this point, unless we know what the older residents are thinking, we won't know if you or I are correct when we assert that the older demographics are for or against the festival.
You may be the exception rather than the norm, or I may be misleading myself. But, if there is only responses from this forum to go by, we'll never know.
ali_harry
9:56am, 16 November 2009
1Davidson - if you have a look at the consultant's brief available on the council website http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/default/A5_-_St_Kilda_Festival_Review_-_Consultation_Brief.pdf
it looks like the consultants will be doing a lot more than just reading this forum.
I'd say that the consultants would have absolutely nothing to do with the festival and so that in itself would overcome the bias you're so concerned about.
christine
11:19pm, 15 November 2009
2I've lived in St.Kilda for about 30 years. I really enjoy the festival - the diverse music, the stalls, the crowds, the food, the setting on the beach. The children's entertainment is great if you've got small kids as well. We have taken overseas guests there and they've absolutely loved it. I look forward to it each year.
Sadly, we all have to put up with the Grand Prix. Albert Park Lake has ugly bits of construction for about 3 months. Traffic is disrupted along Lakeside Drive for 2 or 3 weeks. The whining noise is constantly loud and annoying and you can't shut it out. Goes on for days. The jets flying over make a horrendous noise and frighten small children and dogs. Nasty yobs gather in the streets and are generally obnoxious.
But if you don't like St.Kilda festival, well it's only 1 day. You can go out for the day. You'll be missing out though.
hopeforthefest
10:11am, 16 November 2009
2i love the crowds, the noise, the happiness on so many faces. The variety of the day and the people. This festival is something to be so proud of.
My fav fest in my fav suburb, my home.
Long live the fest!! such great memories from every year.

